Posted by Tim Marshall on Apr 9th 2024
Debunking Myths About Optic Mount Heights
In recent years, the firearm industry has witnessed a significant trend towards taller optic mounts, sparking debates and inquiries about their practicality and effectiveness. In this blog post, we delve into the nuances of optic mount heights, dispel common myths, and offer insights into their significance in various shooting scenarios.
The proliferation of tall optic mounts like the GBRS group’s Hydra and Lerna mounts has raised questions among enthusiasts and professionals alike. Why opt for such high mounts, and do they truly enhance performance?
Firstly, it's essential to understand that these mounts are not designed solely for range shooting. While lower mounts suffice for stationary target practice, the landscape of modern firearm training emphasizes dynamic movements, including close-quarters battle (CQB) tactics. Taller mounts facilitate a more heads-up posture, enabling shooters to maintain better situational awareness and maneuverability.
Considerations for optic mount height extend beyond personal preference. Factors such as body stature and intended use play pivotal roles in determining the ideal mount height. While a 1.93 mount might suffice for range shooting, scenarios involving gas masks or night vision necessitate taller mounts for optimal alignment and comfort.
A common concern regarding tall mounts revolves around the concept of height over bore and its impact on accuracy, particularly in close-range engagements. However, simply looking at the difference in offset between various mount heights reveals how negligible this is. With proper training and familiarization, shooters can effectively adapt to different offsets and maintain precision across distances.
Training is paramount in mastering optic offset and maximizing shooting proficiency. Experimenting with different mount heights, practicing on diverse targets, and honing your offset holds are essential steps toward achieving consistency and accuracy in various scenarios.
Ultimately, the choice of optic mount height should align with the shooter's requirements and intended applications. While lower mounts suffice for range enthusiasts, professionals engaging in dynamic training environments may benefit from taller mounts that promote better posture and situational awareness.
In conclusion, the discourse surrounding optic mount heights underscores the importance of informed decision-making and practical training. By understanding the rationale behind tall mounts, dispelling misconceptions, and prioritizing training, shooters can optimize their equipment and enhance their shooting capabilities across diverse scenarios.
As the firearm industry continues to evolve, embracing advancements in equipment and training methodologies will empower shooters to adapt and excel in dynamic environments. Optic mount heights are but one aspect of this multifaceted landscape, offering opportunities for innovation and optimization in firearm performance and training.